The deadly no mercy HINDU holocaust unleashed by Muslim invaders!

We saw that India was witness to HINDU holocaust unleashed by Christian British for over 190 years as they plundered her wealth, raped women, maimed industries, imported diseases, ensured poverty and famine and murdered many hundred millions of Hindus like cattle.

https://www.straighttalks.in/2018/09/the-hindu-holocaust-which-india-and.html

Recently a Congress Politician who became famous after coming hard on British, condoned Muslims invaders because  Muslims arrived in India not the with the simplistic intention of loot, kill and scoot but for acquiring permanent residency after looting , raping and killing. He praised the Muslim invaders for this altruism. This means that if a robber arrived in your house with intention of converting your family into Islam, married your family women and stayed back in your home, then they may be deemed to have done your family a great favour. Because your family has now become the Muslim’s family and his slaves. Sashi Tharoor’s Muslim embracing outlook is typical of the elitist Congress party to which he belongs and the subtle contempt he holds for Hindus was probably to please the vote bank by which party has survived on. Having hurt Sanatan Dharma by his betrayals, he is now pretending extra to prove that he is a Hindu.

Islamic Prophet Muhammed died in 632 AD and within six years, the Arabs had run over Syria, Egypt, Iran and Iraq. The Kingdoms of Kapisa-Gandhara in modern day Afghanistan, Zabulistan and Sindh in modern Pakistan were culturally and politically part of India during ancient times.  The first clash of an Indian ruler and an Afghan ruler took place in 643 AD when Arab forces defeated Rutbil, King of Zabulistan. Later Afghanistan was run over and Islamic rulers conquered places till Sindh. The Umayyad governor of Damascus, Hajjaj led an expedition in 712 AD into Sind. He took to mass executions, took women as slaves, Jat men were sold slaves in other lands, temples demolished , wealth plundered according to Chach Nama records. After a pause, other Muslim invaders crossed the Indus River into India. What followed was the longest continuous intense rampaging of a living civilisation by brute barbarians who put savage wild animals to shame with their gory blood baths that may make Nazis comparatively compassionate in the eyes of the world. 

Muslim invasion of India resulted in their direct rule for over 800 years though they have a history of invasions for over a thousand years. The n number of Muslim invaders of various racial origins but with the same sword of Islam waged #80+ major wars on India. Minor wars accounted to five times more. Whole cities were ravaged with every incumbent killed, thousands of temples razed down, tonnes of gold plundered, every Hindu women raped and enslaved and if any child escaped death, they were enslaved too.

It is usual for every author on the subject of Islamic violence on Hindus to quote Will Durant. Will Durant wrote in 1935 in his ‘History of Civilisation: Our Oriental Heritage’: “ The Mohammedan conquest of India was the bloodiest in history. The Islamic scholars and historians have written with great glee and pride the slaughters of Hindus, forced conversions, abduction of Hindu women and children to slave markets, and the destruction of temples by warriors of Islam during 800 AD to 1700 AD.”

Alain Danielou claimed too in his “Histoire de l inde”: “From the time Muslims started arriving in 632AD, the history of India becomes a long, monotonous series of murders, massacres, spoilations, and destructions. As usual it was all in the name of the holy war of their faith, of their sole god and the barbarians have wiped out civilisations, entire races”. 

The genocide inflicted by Islamic invaders in the form of Arabs, Turkish, Afghans and Mughals have never been recognised for the scale and intensity inflicted on Hindus. Nothing of such proportions happened anywhere else or at any other point of time. Christian British came close to matching the Islamic invaders and Pacifist Hindus were the only race that bore the brunt of two Holocausts in all history. Yet history books on India do not focus on the crimes of invaders but instead praise them for contribution to Indian civilisation. Indian civilisation continued to evolve despite these invaders. 

Since the time of Umayyad dynasty in 711 AD to the end of Bahadur Shah Zafar in 1858, entire hindu cities were burnt down, genocides became commonplace, rapes routine as cold and those who refused instant conversion to Islam were deported as slaves. Every invader was proud of the height of his hill of skulls of Hindus. The hindu race in Afghanistan was annihilated this way. Hindukush means Hindu slaughter and reminder of the barbarism of Islam. But later leftist historians claimed it referred Hindu Kashmir. Can we get the numbers of those killed in Hindukush please?

During 1001 AD and 1026 AD, Afghan invader Mohamed al Ghazni invaded India #17 times. His assistant described his invasions in the book, ‘Tarikh I Yamini”: The blood of the infidels flowed so copiously in the city of Thaneswar so much that the stream was discoloured and notwithstanding its purity, people were unable to drink it. The infidels deserted the fort and tried to cross the foaming river but many of them were slain, taken or drowned. Nearly fifty thousand men were killed”.

Irfan Husain wrote in, ‘Demons from the Past’: “ The Muslim heroes who figure larger than life in history books committed some dreadful crimes. Mohamed Ghazni, Qutubuddin Aibak, Balban, Mohammed Bin Qasim and Sultan Mohammed Tughlak, all have blood stained hands with the passage of time that hasn’t cleansed them. He further observed,” The Hindu temples were razed, their idols smashed,  their women raped, their men killed or taken slaves. When Mohamed Ghazni entered Somnath on one of his annual raids, he slaughtered 50,000. When Aibak invaded he killed and enslaved hundreds of thousands Hindus. The conquerors justified their killings by claiming it is their religious duty to smite non believers. Cloathing themselves in the banner of Islam, they claimed they were fighting for their faith while in reality they were indulging in straight forward slaughter and pillage”. 

Another writer who was eyewitness to the invasion of the first sultan of Delhi, Qutubuddin Aibak (1194 AD to 1210 AD), Hassan Nizam I Naishapuri wrote in his, ‘Taj ul Massir” thus:” Conquering Meerut, he demolished all the temples of the city and erected Mosques in their sites. On entering Aligarh, he converted all to Islam by the sword and those who chose to adhere to their mother religion were beheaded”. Qutubuddin Aibak’s General Baktiar massacred Buddhist monks and Brahmin scholars in Bihar and destroyed Nalanda and Vikramshila universities and wrought havoc. In 1265, a lakh of Rajputs were exterminated in Delhi by Ghiyasuddin Balban. 

A Persian historian Wassaf wrote in his book, “Tazjiyat ul Amsar ul Asar”: “Alauddin Khilji, the second ruler of Khilji dynasty (1295-1316) after capturing the city of Khambayat in the Gulf of Cambay, he killed all the adult male population for the glory of Islam, set flowing rivers of blood, and made 20,000 hindu maidens his private slaves”. He ordered the killing of 30,000 people of Chittor according to Amir Khusrau. Khilji also had 50,000 personal boy slaves with him and there were 70,000 slaves who worked for him in his palace”. The slaves were shackled,chained and humiliated continuously.

The Tughlak rulers had their share of pie in the gory story of Hindu holocaust. In 1323, Mohamed Bin Tughlak slaughters 12,000 ascetics of Srirangam Temple. Firoz Shah Tughlaq beheaded 180,000 Hindus in Bengal around 1353. Ten years later during 1365-67, more than 500,000 inhabitants of Vijayanagara were slaughtered by Bahami Sultanate. 70,000 Hindus were also massacred in Raichur Doab.

Muslim historian Mohammed Qasim Hindu Shah known as Firishta wrote two works known as Tarikh I Firishta and Gulshan I Ibrahim,and lived during 1560 and 1620. He calculated that 400 million Hindus were slaughtered during occupation and invasion during his time. Survivors were castrated or enslaved or were punished with both. The population of India which was 600 million came down to 200 million in mid 1500s. Two third of the race was annihilated. If this was racism, what is?

Castration was a practice during Muslim rule. The purpose of having castrated around was to give carnal pleasures to the rulers, provide security, and provide loyalty as castrated had no hope of raising family. Most importantly, it brought down drastically the numbers of the conquered. India’s population declined from 200 million in 1000 AD to 170 million in 1500 AD says Khan in his book, Islamic Jihad. Kings Akbar, Jehangir and Aurangazeb too had eunuchs and castrated men as slaves. Khan further claims that Sultan Mohammed Tughlak, Sultan Firoz Tughlak had 20000 and 40000 boy slaves respectively. Firoz Tughlak had 1,80,000 slaves with him. Many commanders were eunuchs. And many sultans were in love with young boys. Did the holy book of Islam permit that?

Not mentioning of Tīmūr, the Turko Mughal ruler will be criminal. His appalling atrocities reached the length and breadth of the land. He targeted Hindus alone. Every hindu in Delhi was either killed or enslaved. DELHI was looted. Author Keay says that before reaching Delhi, Timur had also killed all the 100,000 prisoners he held for fear of rebellion. Conservative estimates claim 500,000 died in and around Delhi. The fact a contemporary filmi nawab has found fit to honour this criminal by naming his son after him proves, threats to Hindus continue to exist. Deep down some today continue to enjoy Hindus being butchered but call themselves secular. 

Lodhi dynasty was honoured in Delhi by Nehru Govt in many forms. This dynasty followed religious prosecution violently. Tarikh I Daudi writes: “ Sikander Lodi entirely ruined the shrines of Mathura..the idols were given to butchers as stone weights..Hindus were banned from shaving their heads or beards or perform ablutions..every city had to adhere to Islam”. The burning and killings of Hindus in Bihar, Uttar Pradesh and Bengal continued. 

The arrival of Mughals  in India is often painted in subtle bright colours by historians to divert the fact that they were blood red. Tuzak i Barbari ,an autobiographical record of King Babur states that he targeted Hindus, Sikhs and non Sunni sects of Islam. Towers of Skull of infidels were built on hillocks claims the book. Babur-nama also has records of massacres. Akbar’s early period of reign was no different. The massacre of Hindus of Garha in 1560 AD, the Chittor and Rantambhor campaigns, the killing of all Rajputs and Brahmins in the fortress of Bhun were proof that Akbar had his hands dripped in blood. 8000 Rajput women immolated themselves.  Yet Akbar is hailed as tolerant in history books as he took to some cosmetic practices on gaining hindu wives. If you recollect, your school history books hail the physical strength of Moghuls and the sacrifices of Himayun while cleverly hiding the cannibalism inflicted on India. Who twisted history? The purpose was to sleight hindu sacrifices and to hide Muslim criminalities That’s now called secularism!

Jehangir celebrated as an art connoisseur by historians was equally murderous. After imprisoning Guru Arjun Dev now considered the First martyr Guru of Sikhism, Jehangir killed him inside prison. But Aurangazeb was the cruelest. He can give Hitler a run for money on racist violence. In 1669, he ordered to stop teaching of hindu education in schools and temples. He also ordered the destruction of 100s of temples, built mosques in their places using the same stones. Hindu idols were smashed and Mathura was renamed Islamabad. Paul Joseph estimates 4.6 million were killed during his reign. Mathew White estimates that Aurangazeb lost 2.5 million soldiers in his wars with Maratha kings. 

Tipu Sultan was against Moplah Muslims and Christians too. He ordered the demolition of temples in Kerala. In Seringapatnam, young men were forcibly circumcised and inducted into army. Thousands of kodava Hindus were subject to torture, death and forced conversions. 5600 Christians were killed. About 800 Mandyam Iyengars were beheaded. Tipu fought Christian British to defend and propagate Islam and some twist and hail him a freedom fighter. Distorting history is compulsory to be called a contemporary historian but defending a murderer as innocent exposed them.

Now, we need to ask the essential question. Which is the most damaging holocaust in all history of planet earth? The Jewish holocaust inflicted by Nazis, the Hindu holocaust by Christian British or the Hindu holocaust Muslim invaders of India? Some calculate the number of dead Hindus during Islamic barbarism as #800 million. It ought to have been beyond #1000 million dead as whole cities were slaughtered by Muslim invaders. Never in the annals of any nation’s history had so many died and a civilisation ravaged for so long a period of time. Despite such horrors, India was a developed nation when the Christian British arrived to take over in another excercise of greed.

History always has valuable lessons to offer. But history that has been distorted can offer no lessons. Hindus despite many tens of centuries of holocaust still respect Gods of other religions as theirs and have no deep hurt on those who inflicted deep injuries  on them proves the fact Sanatan Dharma is truly spiritual and all sustaining. Despite such gruesome past, India’s majority has remained Hindu. We need to acknowledge the Islamic population of Afghanistan, Pakistan and many within India were once Hindus whose ancestors were converted. Taking all into account, we can say Hindus now account for about 60% of the then Bharat civilisation , as nations were not in existence until recently.  Yet it will not pay Hindus  to be continually be gullible as they had been in the past. The lesson for Hindus is the need to shore up their defences, become Kshatriyic than Brahmanic, be on the alert and never blindly trust the forces that eliminated their ancestors, traditions and heritage without any mercy. If the Hindus don’t understand and realise their past, they may be inviting another holocaust which neither the world nor they can afford. Enemies are in the prowl. Beware. The threats are real. Every call of unity of Hindus is now twisted as terrorism by forces that want Hindus remain disunited and gullible as they were in the past. If not alert, Hindus may not get another opportunity even to lament later. The media, the Lutyens, the elitist Congress party pose real threats but they will do anything to sabotage the unity of Hindus. They are the enemies within.

Attempts to minimise the damage caused by Muslim rulers continues even today. Not just by leftist historians like Irfan Habib or British historians like Simon Digby but also by the Congress party with the  likes of Shashi Tharoor. Indian History needs to be rewritten. It needs to be factual which it isn’t. We need to inspire our children. Children need to be taught their heritage. Contemporary History works are propaganda materials for leftists and Seculars as they were during the British Raj. It’s not easy to unlearn and deeducate 70 + 190 + 800 years of inculcation. But unless, Indians learn past history and understand their past sacrifices and achievements, another holocaust may be in the offing. Unless every hindu reacts and responds to the call of their civilisation, the Hindu civilisation may not survive another Holocaust. Are you prepared?

“India was the motherland of our race and Sanskrit the mother of European languages. She was the mother of our philosophy, mother, through Arabs, of much of our Mathematics, mother through Buddha of the ideals embodied in Christianity, mother through the village community of self governance and democracy. Mother India is in many ways the Mother of us all” - Will Durant. 

Time is now to protect and preserve the Mother of Humanity. Her sons and daughters have this responsibility. Time to wake up!